The term evolution means the gradual change of all forms of things on earth. The apparent development of organisms on earth is attributed to this process. It is a slow process and therefore takes a lot of time to manifest in anything. The occurrence of progression is due to the absolute necessity for adaptation to a changing environment of organisms. Christian arguments against evolution thus arises.
Christians disagree with the story of development. This can be attributed to the various inconsistence that come with the theory. The stories from the holy bible contradict it and also lack of signs in nature for evolution. Christians are known to believe in a supreme God. This is a supernatural and makes no mistakes in his designs. And in this sense nothing that God designs into the world needs to change.
The recordings in the holy bible are as ancient and truthful beyond any doubt. Yet contrary to the theories of development, all life in record is as it was. All forms of life are as they were described in ancient times. Such knowledge puts a question mark to the theories of evolution. Evolutionists have no answers to date.
Not even in recent decades or centuries has there been any vivid report of development. Its existence remains only in theory and experiment. Despite multitudes of research activities the presence of evolution has no evidence. Even the most similar creatures bare a remarkable element of distinction. And show no sign of transition whatsoever.
Over years, evolutionists have used fossils to push their case forward. This has not been of much help either. This is due to the fact that no fossil so far has been able to genuinely prove their argument. No remains have been found so far that can prove presence of an intermediate organism undergoing change. Basing on this missing piece theory, evolutionists have no grounds for argument. Any attempts made will be pointless.
The argument for development is based on naturalism. The philosophy of naturalism states that all earthly things are caused by nature and its laws. Emphasis is put on nature and its force laws. This theory is skeptic of the existence of supernatural beings. When followed well, this philosophy too leaves a lot to be desired. It does not give comprehensive elucidations to universal existences. This therefore proves both theories inadequate in nature and not fit for use.
Also the use of genetic comparisons of organisms to forge a link in organisms is common. Evolutionists try to relate creatures using genetic element similarity. This hardly helps their case much as it does not explain the missing parts to this theory. It in fact proves that there is indeed a perfect designer.
In view of the grounds examined so far, Christians have a more sound argument. It is elaborate and coherent with no loose ends. On the other side evolutionists fail to provide proof for their theory both from the past and present. Therefore in conclusion, it is only fitting to justify the Christians. Evolution is only a theory yet to be proven as facts of nature if at all.
Christians disagree with the story of development. This can be attributed to the various inconsistence that come with the theory. The stories from the holy bible contradict it and also lack of signs in nature for evolution. Christians are known to believe in a supreme God. This is a supernatural and makes no mistakes in his designs. And in this sense nothing that God designs into the world needs to change.
The recordings in the holy bible are as ancient and truthful beyond any doubt. Yet contrary to the theories of development, all life in record is as it was. All forms of life are as they were described in ancient times. Such knowledge puts a question mark to the theories of evolution. Evolutionists have no answers to date.
Not even in recent decades or centuries has there been any vivid report of development. Its existence remains only in theory and experiment. Despite multitudes of research activities the presence of evolution has no evidence. Even the most similar creatures bare a remarkable element of distinction. And show no sign of transition whatsoever.
Over years, evolutionists have used fossils to push their case forward. This has not been of much help either. This is due to the fact that no fossil so far has been able to genuinely prove their argument. No remains have been found so far that can prove presence of an intermediate organism undergoing change. Basing on this missing piece theory, evolutionists have no grounds for argument. Any attempts made will be pointless.
The argument for development is based on naturalism. The philosophy of naturalism states that all earthly things are caused by nature and its laws. Emphasis is put on nature and its force laws. This theory is skeptic of the existence of supernatural beings. When followed well, this philosophy too leaves a lot to be desired. It does not give comprehensive elucidations to universal existences. This therefore proves both theories inadequate in nature and not fit for use.
Also the use of genetic comparisons of organisms to forge a link in organisms is common. Evolutionists try to relate creatures using genetic element similarity. This hardly helps their case much as it does not explain the missing parts to this theory. It in fact proves that there is indeed a perfect designer.
In view of the grounds examined so far, Christians have a more sound argument. It is elaborate and coherent with no loose ends. On the other side evolutionists fail to provide proof for their theory both from the past and present. Therefore in conclusion, it is only fitting to justify the Christians. Evolution is only a theory yet to be proven as facts of nature if at all.
About the Author:
Discover the concept of Christian arguments against evolution by reading our published blogs. To know more about the topic, visit the relevant website right now at http://daywithoutyesterday.net.
No comments:
Post a Comment